@misc{Kobyliński_Andrzej_Porównanie_2005,
 author={Kobyliński, Andrzej and Chodoła, Tomasz},
 year={2005},
 rights={Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone (Copyright)},
 description={Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu; 2005; nr 1081, s. 288-295},
 publisher={Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The paper provides a short overview of models and standards of software process assessment and improvement (SPA/SPI). All the models can be grouped into two classes: staged and continuous. Staged architecture models assess software organization capability and explicitly describe it in terms of maturity level. Continuous architecture models evaluate individual processes' capability, not organization as a whole. Advantages and disadvantages for both representations (architectures) are described.},
 title={Porównanie ciągłych i etapowych modeli oceny i doskonalenia procesów programowych},
 type={artykuł},
}